CoStar vs Reonomy
| CoStar | Reonomy | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★★★★☆ 4.2 | ★★★★☆ 4 |
| Starting Price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Category | Data & Market Intelligence | Data & Market Intelligence |
| Free Plan | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free Trial | ✗ | ✗ |
| Best For | Commercial real estate brokers, institutional investors, and developers who need the most comprehensive CRE market data available | Commercial real estate brokers, lenders, and investors who need owner intelligence and off-market property data |
| Founded | 1987 | 2013 |
CoStar Pros
- Most comprehensive commercial real estate database available
- Used by 250,000+ CRE professionals
- Deep historical transaction and lease data
Cons
- Very expensive — average contract ~$15,000/year
- Pricing is not publicly listed and varies significantly
- Overkill for small investors or residential agents
Reonomy Pros
- Comprehensive commercial property data including off-market ownership
- AI-powered search simplifies prospecting
- Owner contact information for direct outreach
Cons
- Pricing not transparent — requires sales contact
- Data quality gaps in some secondary markets
- Not as comprehensive as CoStar for some CRE use cases